She has ass on the mind.
It's one of only two things she knows how to to. The other produces sex tapes and neglected babies.
She should probably schedule a jazz standards album with Mr. Bennett sometime in the near future.
When you finally cut the jazz standards album, playing state fairs and bumping into Loverboy and Alan Jackson back stage can't be too far off.
On the upside, Tony Bennett, continues to make the most out of being the conduit for former big things transitioning into waning career status.
If it was anyone else, I'd say she was trying to channel Dianna Ross in the picture, but since Gaga actually does have a fairly solid musical background, I'll say she's going for Cleo Laine in her prime.
Kinda reminds me of this....
I long for the days when nobody paid much attention to what 13 year olds have to say about anything - except maybe other 13 year olds.
Do your homework and clean your room.
9 ways to look completely clueless.
This -eezus fad is so stupid.
Yes, I was wrong. I'm not the most observant of Catholics and haven't sweated the details since grade school, to be honest.
I think the point is that we're talking about beliefs and faith, which by definition, is a belief not based on proof. Despite reference materials oftentimes offered up as "proof" (the various Bibles, the Quran, etc), they are, at best, retellings of observations made by others many, many years ago. The degree to which one has "faith" that they represent the words and thinking of God or whatever deity they're ascribed to varies by the sect one belongs to and the degree to which one accepts the teachings of that sect as absolute.
So it's all pretty much subjective and personal. Arguing about it or taking offense at one person's words regarding it is kind of pointless.
She's referred to as the "Virgin Mary". The "Immaculate Conception" refers to the belief that she was impregnated by God the Father and that she never had intercourse. It's not a reference to her state of having sinned or not.
One must wear a cowboy hat when one is with the horses. A fashionable yet practical straw lid let's the head breathe and keeps the bountiful and always active brain matter from overheating. It also makes the straw-like hair look less like straw in comparison.
When they're pumping out 19 kids per couple or whatever I doubt they have much time to take action (whatever that might be, aside from annoying their friends) on their beliefs. On the other hand I know a couple of Catholic families - including some of my own relatives - who could give them a decent run for their money in that department.
I don't know if I'm being reasonable or I just remember a time before this whole medium came into being, making comments that basically would be kept to oneself or amongst one's inner circle part of the public domain. Maybe it's better this way, with some people not knowing enough to censor themselves and revealing some of the questionable beliefs they adhere to. Ultimately he pulled it down, which means he's not really willing to go much beyond his initial misstep in terms of making his beliefs well-known on a widespread basis.
If there are any worth worrying about, it's those who step it up a notch rather than backing down when called out for their candor. Most of those end up on an FBI, NSA or Southern Poverty Law Center watch list.
I'm Catholic and I don't care. That's what his religion says, that's fine. I don't belong to a perfect sect, nor does he. People need to grow a little thicker skin.
This is exactly right.
In particular emphasis on 3 was, and I assume still is, a part of any good treatment program, self-help or otherwise. Once diagnosed (again, self or otherwise) it is the addict's responsibility to avail themselves of the available help - much of which is free - and to keep themselves from using by utilizing what they've learned and by maintaining a solid, life long, sobriety program. There's no cure, there's only abstinence.
The addict is always responsible for their actions, both when using and when not. Part of the recovery process is acknowledging that responsibility and accepting whatever consequences come from it, correcting what can be corrected if possible.
Unfortunately, a lot of addicts assume a period of time w/o usage means they can pay less attention to their recovery or, in cases, assume they weren't really addicts to begin with. Or, rationalizing their addiction as something they can "handle" by controlling intake. Situations like this one tend to be the result of one of those things occurring.
If you don't like the term "disease", perhaps "allergy" is more acceptable. People who have allergies to a particular substance generally don't have a problem as long as they take care not to ingest or expose themselves to the substance. Addiction works much the same way. As long as an addict doesn't ingest the substance or expose themselves to situations where the temptation to ingest it is too strong, they'll generally be able to live a normal, productive, healthy life.
Welcome to the Rita Ora zone, Lilly. You know what you gotta do...
Paris sure looks a lot better than the other sex tape slut - the one with the mattress ass and brain-damaged husband and the baby she's not letting cut into her selfie time.
Wow does this ever look horrible. Congrats to whomever it is who managed to hornswoggle a group of investors into funding the thing (I assume it's been made and this isn't just a test trailer of some sort). That had to be one A-1, shysterrific con-job.
It's about money.
I'd just like to know if those first steps were taken towards Kim and/or Krazye, or away from them.
That's one of those Can-Ams. Depending on where you live, you don't need a cycle license to drive one - a regular driver's license will do. I think CA is a state where that is the case. So she'll have to find some other way to get a ticket. I have complete faith in her ability to do so.
Neither of them are too old to relate to Leann crapping herself the other day. Maybe they could have started with that and worked their way up to musical mommies.
This is a person who at one point in her career worked under the name "Sparkle Jump Rope Queen". I don't think it's necessary, or advisable, to take too much that she says seriously.
Yes, when the Amish start throwing shade at you, your goose is cooked.
Personally don't have an opinion about her one way or the other, but a celebrity shart, regardless of who did it, is too good to pass up. Good catch, pap person.
Why are you lecturing Madonna's teenage daughter?
Eh, she's Italian. It happens. So now Miley will gain some weight and Madonna will gain even more weight (#unapologeticbitch or whatever) and then one of them will squat over a plate of herring and the other two will do something gross with filleted fish and on and on and on we go....until the winner finally dies from something.
Anybody know who that is just to the right of Selena in the picture (to her left)?
This should probably just be a regular feature. Perhaps "KK's Ass of the Day", since people seem to think its changing almost daily, versus just being stuffed into different ill-fitting outfits and shot from different angles.
Suggesting she's doing this to turn a buck is less insulting than insinuating she's a fan of the book.
So I assume the teaser is intended to hype the trailer which, in turn hypes the movie. And you're doing your part here by teasing the teaser with the Beyonce mention. I'd hate to be an accountant for a flick like this one making sure everyone who teased the teaser for the trailer for the movie got their $8.43 or $4.19 or $11.35 in click through revenue. What a nightmare.
First one of these attention whores who has full-on, onstage butt-sex, wins. My money's on Cyrus.
This insincere disdain for the trappings of her chosen career grows tiresome.
She's not gorgeous. She looks like a troll.
"Douche" and all it's iterations are being overused here. Try tossing in the occasional "ass-wipe" or "jag-bag" so that the d-word isn't eventually rendered meaningless. It's too good a reference to lose.
All three fit Adam Levine like a glove.
Usually her giant honking ass would be the most noticeable thing in the picture, but in this case it takes a back seat, so to speak, to the baby bump being baked in the sun just to her right.
I'm assuming that pictures of Kim and her ass are click magnets, otherwise there would be no particular reason for many sites, including this one, to feature it so frequently.
No need for her to apologize. Other than sites like this one, I don't think anyone really cares. She's going to have to start referring to her kid as a n***a again or something before people start paying her much attention.
Life's a bitch when you're famous. Another idiot with their fake complaining about success.
Just so she's wearing clean underwear. You know. Like your mom used to tell you. In case of a crash. Jeans look like she's already been in a crash. The top's not fancy either. So she's good - if they crash. Then again, if they crashed we probably would have heard by now. So she's probably okay. That's a relief. Okay then.
Yeah, poor Kim. Please leave her alone. Poor thing. You guys are always picking on her. Here she is trying to explain something you obviously don't understand (the fashion sensibilities of an infant) and all you can do is mock her for it. Haters!
I hope her porno partner got a bonus for actually being able get it up and keep it up long enough to perform with this hose-bag.
Lamar is/was a pretty major drug abuser. You can't just factor that out of any discussion of whatever happened in their relationship. Even the women he was with - if you go back to the stories at the time, you'll see that at least a couple of them appeared to be facilitating his drug use more than anything. You can't apply standards of behavior or attempt to explain said behavior as you would if severe drug abuse wasn't an issue for one or both parties involved.
While this is fine for now, hopefully once she poots out the kid, she'll get down to a size where she can pose in Max's cargo pants and t-shirt.
Who the hell decides they're gonna put on their 4 year old kid's clothing in the first place?
Any shrink worth their salt would have a field day with this one...
I'm not complaining. She'd look hot having an epileptic fit.
Although I will take credit for correctly calling what the reaction would be in the comments section when I requested you guys post more of her.
Odom was out binging hard on crack, most likely as a way of coping with the insanity that surrounds this family of succubi and this stupid c**t is whining about Beyonce tickets.
That outfit she's wearing suggests "long-time homeless" more than it does "timeless hotness".
...and if you've seen her face and her boobs, you've seen the best parts already. The rest of her body, compared to many others, is none too spectacular. She's overexposed in other ways, already. Which is probably why Playboy, at this point, isn't willing to dish out the kind of money she'd want in order to be in it. The ROI probably isn't all that great, comparatively.
So we have LeAnn Rimes who can sing just about anybody off the stage and who has one messy relationship and an ongoing feud with a reality TV skank and we're supposed to hate everything she does.
On the other hand we have Taylor Swift who, in actuality, couldn't carry a tune in a FedEx truck and who's a notorious serial psychotic ex-girlfriend and she's the sweetest, most wonderful young lady in all of what passes for country music these days.
Something ain't right about that.
Nothing screams adorable like fading arm and hand tats. Has she got any on her belly? Those will be looking adorable after she poots out the youngin.
She's moving to French, MT?
In the good old days this kind of thing would be settled in the mud wrestling pit and each contestant would take home about $23 in wet, dirty singles.
Emily - is he sweet, or a Swede? Either way, check your spelling.
That hairdo looked great on my grandma when she was Taylor's age.
Add another 18" to the length of that dress and you'd think you were looking at one of those colorized WWII pics that are floating around the information turnpike these days.
Since when do celebrities have to get a clearance from sites like this one before bumping uglies and knocking each other up? If Ryan Gosling wants to bang a hot, passionate Latin chick rather than put it to a frigid, Irish mope, why is that anyone else's business?
I honestly don't care if she's intelligent. I'll never be having a conversation with her. Just get more pics of her, like the one just above that's linked somewhere else and features her giant boobs testing the limits of a white tube top with arms.
Then go ahead and add your usual stuff and people can call her a whore and we'll all be happy.
Could you two start obsessing over Nicole Scherzinger? I'd much rather look at her.
If I never heard another word about what she thinks about anything, I think I could survive. Just turn around and show everybody your ass, baby, and stfu.
Musta been a power outage at Kasa de Kardashian. Looks like she dressed in the dark.
Lana's on the right (Franco's left). In the future, please don't ask the people who run this thing to do anything more then kvetch and rant about how a particular IG picture makes them feel about the people pictured in it. It's not in their job descriptions.
They're Scientologists, correct? That's more likely to mess them up than is being a tad precocious. Scientology is full of "free spirits" who have control freak handlers working in the background to make sure they don't stray to far away from herd.
Latin chicks. Much hotter than Irish chicks. Can't blame him, but he should have wrapped that rascal because he's gonna need a flame-retardant suit dealing with her until the kid's of legal age.
Plastic surgery is not "magical". It's a medical procedure. And this bobble-head makes enough money just showing up places and tweeting out endorsements to afford better than she's had. If she was a nobody, then, yes, she'd look fine. As America's version of royalty, she looks like crap - cheap crap.
This appears to be about Wayne Coyne and Moby trying to kick some life into their waning careers.
Would I prefer you not dig yourself in deeper here? Of course not. But I really have no control over that - you do. So if you want to keep replying, have at it.
I'm not as obsessed by your occasional grammar screw-up as I am by the irony of your reaction to criticism, considering your chosen profession.
Hmm....I still think "with" works better with "obsessed" than does "by".
I stand corrected, although it's the more clumsy usage.
Sensitive little flower, aren't you?
"obsessed with", not "obsessed by"
Apparently not. God, the stupidity....is amusing...and reliable.
I don't know if it's the worst of the worst (MTO probably takes that crown - but at least from time to time they do actually bust a story), but it's certainly the worst of the EHM group.
It's like a train wreck and I'm beginning to think that's the schtick. Who knows who really writes this stuff but the personalities portrayed here are those of a couple of self-hating, bitter schlumps who spend their days following the social media sites of a select few celebrities whom they alternately fawn over or chastise depending on what portion of their menstrual cycle is in bloom on that particular day.
If it's a bit featuring, it succeeds in bringing people back to see just how ridiculous their next post here is going to be. At least that's my excuse for coming back.
If this is really how these two are, then I guess they're to be congratulated for turning the misery of self-loathing projected onto others into a money making enterprise.
So if he's a douche for "sharing this photo with the whole entire internet", what does that make a person who reposts it in order to generate click revenue, while proclaiming outrage over the same?
Nobody looks good with that one-side-of-the-head-shaved cut. Looks like you're recovering from brain surgery. Anything Skrillex is doing from a fashion standpoint should be avoided like the plague.
Who says "don't stay together for the kids"?
You do what's best for the kids, period. There's no hard, fast rule that applies in all cases. If it turns out the best option for the kids is to stay together, that's what you do.
Not to defend sucky articles, but posting a selfie in a bikini while flipping the bird doesn't scream "I have a career I'm serious about and I'm a great mother" - particularly when taking into account her claim to fame in the first place.
The combination of spit from those two has the potential to spawn a worldwide epidemic of Black Plague proportions.
Well now the boobs no longer match the face, so it's still not a fix.
I'm good with the gay and interracial aspects of the relationship. It's the size differential that's bothersome. All that slouching is going to cost Ireland her modeling career. And that would be a shame.
If you want your private life respected, keep it private.
Remember the good ole days before Twitter and IG and Vine and all the rest of it when celebrity kids could be the jackwads we always figured they were in relative obscurity? I think it was better for everybody all the way around.
I mean, I keep clicking on these links expecting to see a Willow Smith or Kylie Jenner or Ireland Baldwin beating a puppy or mocking a homeless person or peeing on the street or sucking face with their "BFF" (oh, wait, that happened) or something and all it ever turns out to be is one of them looking mopey or bored or attempting to gaze knowingly off into the distance as they shoot yet another picture of themselves with their cell phone.
It's bad enough they waste their time doing such boring stuff. Why is anyone bothering to follow them, repost what they post and treat it like the images used in a Thematic Apperception Test?
Isn't this kind of stupid stuff what Twitter's for? Just do your silly rap thingies and sing your stupid songs and then STFU. Nobody wants to look at that.
"Can somebody maybe explain why we have to look at the beautiful Chrissy Teigen's blank boob?"
Shouldn't have to explain, but yes. If her nips were showing they'd have to cover them up with something in order to display them on most magazine racks or send through the mail. Added expense, possible relegation to non-prime placement, etc. Easier and cheaper to just shop them out.
Not really all that hard to figure out, is it?
Feel better now?
If so, it would be one of her few notable features that is.
Sounds like a good career move. Maybe for both of them.
She looks quite a bit like her half-sister, Sydney.
To quote you, in another thread:
"I think to each their own. Stop judging (Candace), you don't have to like what others do! It's not you're place to judge others marriage."
These people are "nuts", but inviting hookers into a marital relationship shouldn't be judged. Makes perfect sense.
On what grounds are you suggesting they deserve to be mocked?
She's looking more and more like an amateurish CGI rendering.
It's a nice ass. I look forward to watching it get drilled when Hova gets his price for her first porno.
I think you're right, Facts_ The curly tail is clearly missing.
She really is D-list if this is the site the pic ended up on.
Why would you ever mock them?
I doubt she put as much time into thinking about what she posted as you did attempting to make it something worth reposting as content here. You should do an experiment. Just post the pictures and forget about the copy you attach to them for a day or so and see if it makes any difference in the number of hits you get. Might be an eye opener.
Is that the same "tiffany" that posted this the other day?
"Sarah told me once that I was free to leave if I did not like the writing.It made me realize what a dick I was being. I changed how I came on these blogs. I don't talk to people in real life the way I talked to her. Would not. If she was a co-worker would I tell her she sucked? Would I put her down? No. So why was I? The internet doesn't give me the right to bully people around with my opinions. I evolved. People change. She sort of put me in my place. I like the site. I like her writing. She gets to people. Gets to you. Thanks for the stimulating, verbal volleyball. Matt."
If so, it's amazing the lengths some will go to when they get butt-hurt over criticism. Particularly ironic considering what they spend their days doing here. Most legitimate sites won't tolerate that kind of stuff. Just more evidence to suggest that this site is nothing more than a favor Harvey's doing for someone's unemployable relative(s).
This really is nothing new, unfortunately. Children as accessories for their narcissistic celebrity parents is a well known, long standing tradition in Hollywood and the entertainment industry in general. After years of therapy, North will probably write a book that turns into a made-for-TV movie (assuming such things still exist).
If you want to pick someone to compare to Miley Cyrus, this is your person, not Bindi Irwin. To the extent that either performer projects an image (real or mftr'd) which makes them a role model for younger females, the contrast between Taylor and Miley could not be more distinct.
Kanye's certainly been a lot less trouble since they started medicating him. The vacant facial expression bordering on looking brain damaged is a bit off-putting, but no doubt the lesser of two evils.
This is one of those posts that makes me question if everything on this site is written from a sarcastic point of view. I mean, obviously this wasn't a spontaneous exchange. KP's coordinated promotional efforts on behalf of DNC candidates (Obama in particular) are pretty well documented. This didn't just "happen".
Far be it from anyone to suggest that those who wish to be perpetually offended don't have the right to do so. With that comes the risk of others tuning it out, eventually. So you might want to save the outrage for actual instances of intended offense, instead of wasting it on something done by one of the Kardashians. It gets lost in all the other stuff people find offensive about them.
"Kbearing"? Did you mean "Kbaring"? Yes, her dress came bearing (holding or containing or carrying, sort of) her boobs, but it's also baring (exposing) them to a large extent.
Currently, she does look better coming than going. That gigantic blob of cottage cheese that follows her everywhere is looking pretty nasty lately.
Maybe Mariah's consulting her for tips on offing a husband and making it look like a suicide.
To be honest, though, Adriana Lima, Kate Upton and Miranda Kerr also don't look like themselves in this shoot.
What is the deal with selfies?
Photoshop's a thing.
It's the perfect outfit for breast-feeding that genetic disaster she's pushing around in the carriage. The makeup is designed to scare off unwanted breast nuzzlers.
You could have shortened the copy to "Here's a really stupid video." and moved on to your next spectacular IG/Twitter/Vine/Snapchat find.
I see 3 puppies. One of them is cuter than the other two.
She's...what...20 years older than Britney? I doubt Britney could pull that off as well as she did.
They seemed like a couple of kids their age. They were fine. What did you expect them to be like?
Aren't you guys always on them for posting inappropriate selfies?
You need to make up your minds. Do you want them to act their ages, or not?
Why am I not surprised that her best friend was deaf?
They can, but usually they don't. One reason they don't is that when a song gets covered, the songwriter gets royalties.
This person is...what...17..18? She's basically clueless. 2-3 years from now after she's been dropped by whatever label she's on because her sales suck, she'll be begging people to cover her songs.
No, that's not at all what she did. What she did, basically, was take a shot at all the cover versions of her song.
100% natural or not, it's better.
Once again, if you weren't wandering into territory where you don't belong, you wouldn't be suggesting that we can remove those characteristics from a sociopath. It's like suggesting that we could prevent rape by teaching "game" to horny guys or prevent serial killers from leaving a trail of bodies if we could just get them to understand that murdering someone is bad.
But to play devils advocate here, if the problem is misogyny and people viewing women superficially, what does repeatedly posting "inappropriate" selfies taken by Kylie Jenner, for instance, and articles focusing on how good this woman or that woman looks help in that regard? About the 20th or 30th time you've pointed out that Kylie posts inappropriately (including evidence of the same), the point, not to mention the sincerity behind it, tends to get lost.
You seem to want to have it both ways here. You want to (incorrectly) blame the murders, in part, on misogynistic attitudes, while posting, repeatedly, the kind of material one could easily suggest reinforces those attitudes - for profit, I may add. If I'm to take your analysis of the elements leading to these murders to heart - you're a part of the problem.
Sarah, frankly, you're full of crap. This person is a sociopath. As such, you don't reduce the chances of him doing something like this by "removing" the misogynistic attitude, anymore than you can remove "a sense of self-entitlement" from someone who is a sociopath.
You know, while this site is basically fluffy nonsense, you do have a bit of responsibility here NOT to use it as a forum to promote ridiculous theories of how something like this might have been prevented. Someone might actually take you seriously. And that could prove to be a tragic mistake.
This makes about as much sense as arguing a point with one of the self-talkers that wander the streets of any big city. He's a sociopath, as his writings (amongst other things) clearly indicate. Portraying his writings as indicative of some sort of trend regarding how women are viewed is not only ridiculous, it's potentially dangerous in that it ignores the operative mental state of the author. The attitude and objectification are a part of the condition. As such, you're not going to "educate" someone like this and avoid an occurrence of this nature.
Stop looking to celebrities for ANY useful analysis - particularly as regards topics as serious as this one.
That's what a proper ass should look like. I'm glad they ran, for comparison, two oversized fake ones that are, frankly, more obscene, completely covered, for what they're attached to than are the slightly exposed Royal Cakes to the right. Pippa's got nothing on Kate.
Rob's not cut out for the family business, yet he's still essentially on the payroll. The choice is his. Continue to accept the money and put up with being treated like a lesser being, or cut all ties and attempt to make something of himself on his own.
I think its's the effects of the Smith's (non-)parenting style. Both their little weirdos dress and act as if they're craving attention 24/7. Either they've been brought up to believe they should always be the centers of attention, regardless of how inappropriate it is to the situation, or they're acting out because they don't get enough of the proper kids of attention kids should be getting from their parents. Whatever it is, it certainly doesn't reflect well on mom and dad.
Well Kim's a pig with a completely empty head. Kris might actually be kind of interesting and there's probably a better chance of coming away from that one without a life-long STD. Plus it might be possible to find out who Khloe's dad really is. You also didn't include the option of putting a gun to my head and pulling the trigger. So, Kris it is.
Collectively, the hook-up count is somewhere in the low 4 figures.
Isaac Newton should be here soon, wishing she was falling on his face or some such.
Speaking of faces, despite all the talk of plastic surgery, when she isn't mugging for a selfie, she looks pretty much like her old self - with an extra poop-load of makeup slathered on.
Little smart-ass kid needs a spanking.
I find it hard to believe there would be anything creepy going on in that family.
Oddly enough if you cut the head off a chicken it will prance around just like that for a period of time before it falls over dead. Maybe someone should check on the girls...
This one's got the potential to the be skankiest of them all. She's got a lot of competition and she's stepping up to it. Mama should be able to make bank on her for years.
It's the gay following. They're very loyal. They'll still show up for Cher, for God's sake and probably would for Liza if she was able.
Nobody's begrudging her her money or boy-toys. But if you've got 30 years of solid success, start acting like it, instead of behaving like a desperate up & coming 20-something. It's very déclassé.
Madonna won't be truly edgy until she stars in a snuff video. Hurry please, Madge, before Gaga beats you to it.
She made a phone call and tweeted. Sure doesn't take much these days to qualify as a candidate for sainthood. Now, if she took time away from being Mrs. Nickleback and writing songs and making videos targeted at 16 year olds and actually visited him....nah, that's an unrealistic expectation.
Why would anyone listen to a Coldplay album?
There are 4 pictures total. Pics 2 and 3. Look at the arm. Better yet, come back after mommy teaches you how to internet.
Not sure what's going on with his left arm there, but I don't think that has anything to with drinking - at least not directly.
If you really want her to stop (cough, b******t cough), stop doing exactly what she wants you to do when she posts this stuff.
This will probably do wonders for Solange's career. Heard she's booked for SNL. Probably more people listening to her stuff. If so, they're going to figure out they've been listening to the wrong one all this time.
She's just having it changed to a "III". Made the mistake of including her thumb first time around.
Did interest in the older one completely drop off when she turned 18? She was doing a pretty good job of flaunting what she could legally, as well, before that.
As to Matt's second point, the Kardashians seem more than willing to accommodate any and all audiences as long as there's a buck to be made. So do some of the media outlets that cover them.
Still not as bizarre as the way this site goes hot and cold on the same folks over and over and over.
PMS - it'll pass.
Pretty much exactly what I expected. I think Doug got the raw end of the marriage. How he didn't kill her in her sleep is beyond me.
She's one of the 2 or 3 great irrelevant attention whores of our day. She deserves respect for milking every last second out of an already overly long 15 minutes.
Instagram is such a boon for celebrities, particularly those who aren't exactly bringing home the bacon. No need to shell out shekels to some agency in order keep your face (or other body parts) in front of the general populace. If you're willing to bust out a naked non-offensive body part, a hard (yet covered, mostly) nipple or a camel toe, you can make today's rounds of what passes for news outlets.
It's Madonna. She says and does stuff for attention. She referred to one of her kids as a n***a and you went nuts over that. She posts instagram pics in her underwear and you get all squishy over that. Now she uses the word gay like kids did 10 years ago and you go nuts over that. Obviously all this stuff she does is working.
Then again the fake outrage you guys poot out as content benefits from her attention getting as well, so it's a win/win for everyone in the world of mindless celebrity hijinks and those who fawn over them.
Exactly. She's practically a rocket surgeon. She'd never do anything dumb (how many car accidents is it now?).
"And guys, this photo right here....: - Well at least you got the intended gender right.
Then again, I guess if some guys are still burping the worm to Ellen Page, you ladies can pound one out to Zachery...
Are you really offended by this? Isn't Mr.Mariah Carey a comedian? Prominent black comedians have been making jokes about white people for as long as I can remember. Is there not, in reality, "White People Party Music", or for that matter "Black People Party Music" or party music peculiar to various races and ethnic groups? Is it because an album called "Black People Party Music" put out by, let's say, comedian/TV Host Jeff Foxworthy, would result in a firestorm of accusations of racism, that we have to get all uptight because of this?
Why are you, I or anyone else wasting time worrying and wondering and getting at all offended by this? I mean I know why I am. I'm waiting for the cat to finish using the litter box so I can clean it out.
But what's your deal?
I don't know what's more pathetic - her endless and desperate IG lingerie shots or pretending she's actually controversial enough to have accumulated some "haters".
She's a near perfect physical specimen, every straight guy wants her and there's nothing you can do about that, so I suppose she has to be crazy.
Life ain't fair, but jealousy never makes anyone more attractive.
This repeated faux outrage over her pictures accompanying the re-posting them in order to get hits is about as transparent as it can get, not to mention the height of hypocrisy.
Probably busy getting upset about the guy she met in a bar last night who isn't responding to her texts...
Fix it! Or I'm telling Harvey.
It's still not right. Check it again.
Or you could proof read your tag lines for the featured stories above.
Underneath "A Property of TMZ, your Jessica Simpson story, tagged as follows:
"Jessica Simpson Does Daisy Duke - 10 and 2 Babies Years Later"
Harvey should be proud. Actually, Harvey should cut his losses.
So there are people who don't accept homosexuality. And there are people who, despite that or because of it, like watching them on the TV. Get over it already. You're not going to change it. Abortion, homosexuality, climate change - there's not one 100% correct side to any of those issues. As you go through life you're going to find that people don't always agree with the things you think are absolute truths.
You can continue to be a whiney baby about it, or you can move on to more important stuff. Like why sites like this one simultaneously disparage 16 year olds for posting suggestive pics to Instagram and utilize the same to get hits.
Doesn't look any smaller to me. She's got a jacket on so it's gonna look different than when she stuffs it into one of those form-fitting dresses.
Must be completely out of stuff to write about.
An armpit wig? Someone actually makes those? The untapped market for that has to be in the single digits. And if showing armpit hair (fake as it might be) is what it takes for her to get press on her own these days (rubbing up on Miley merits an assist classification), I'd say the career has just about run its course.
If you've seen the pics in question, the photographer didn't really have to shoot up her dress to see the string hanging there. The dress she wearing was short enough that anyone watching the band from crowd level perspective would have had to purposely avert their eyes to not see the string, and more. Whomever was in charge of seeing to it that she wasn't out flashing her business (intentionally or otherwise) to everyone in the first few rows dropped the ball.
Maybe I can help you. I'm not sure what this event was, but I'm guessing she and the other gal are dressed up as members of the back-up band in this Robert Palmer video - which would explain the makeup...
Actually I imagined her being exactly this dense. Then again, nobody really cares what she thinks. You're not actually supposed to read any of the verbiage that surrounds pictures of her.
I keep coming back here hoping that the 5 or 6 or 7 times i've checked it out were flukes and that the people who run this really don't have the limited intellect and maturity of middle-schoolers. No such luck. Apparently it's a "thing". I can stop wasting my time.
I'm pretty sure "Duck Dynasty" will be around long after the plug is pulled on this juvenile site.
where's rob? did they adopt him out this past year? decide he was too chunky for the family photo?
well she's only...what...17? she hasn't been breathing long to really understand why a "rap" performer or the majority of their target audience may prefer to avoid what they can relate to on a day-to-day basis. it's even more unpleasant than the boring, cynical, essentially care-free world of suburban teenage angst she and others like her can relate to.
she appears to be in compliance. her d*ck isn't showing.
god was that stupid. they both look mentally challenged. i don't know how ellen managed to keep a straight face throughout that.
Gee, yah think?
She's porn-ready now.
Sally, the article is suggesting she's going to be "classy" because of the way she looks in the photo above. None of the Kardashians could be described as "classy" and her behavior, so far, hasn't been all that different than the rest of them (suggestive Instagram posting...I seem to recall a picture of her and the younger one flipping the bird at some paps...the recent incident involving both of them getting wasted at a nightclub....etc, etc). The odds are highly in favor of her being just as trashy as the rest of the clan and it's extremely superficial to suggest that just because she doesn't look like the rest of them she's not going to be like the rest of them. If she were my daughter, she'd be spending less time in front of the camera and more hitting the books and attempting to get into colleges where she could learn something that would allow her to provide for herself long after the beauty and general interest in her on the part of a fickle public has faded.
If by classier you mean skinnier, yes, she doesn't come with the pushin' cushion rear end or otherwise look like a walking one night stand, like her sister Kim. But she's been 18 for...what...2-3 days? It's a little early to suggest she's something other than the standard issue Kardashian.
Words are hard!
Google "Yolandi Visser" and click on images. She's part of a South African duo called "Die Antwoord", who've had kind of a running feud with Gaga. Might explain the "art" displayed above.